|
|
Wednesday, January 1st, 2025
| |
7:42 am - Thoughts on education
|
I've been on lj over 9 years now, and I've had lots of thoughts on education [also, I was posting stuff on marypat.org in longer form from 1996 - 2002; I've also written a lot at the Actuarial Outpost on this subject]
So this post is simply to amass posts as I find them, and categorize them. I am defining "education" very broadly here. I may be linking to some friends-locked posts, and will note that when I link. Some of these posts may need to be moved around for better organization. ( a work in progress )
|
|
(7 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, April 30th, 2012
| |
9:20 pm - Observations by Mo
|
Mo: I got to have popcorn shrimp at Golden Corral.
It was like chicken, but smaller. And seafood.
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Saturday, March 31st, 2012
| |
5:20 pm - The way my brain works
|
Part of it, at any rate.
1. Put in a lot of disparate info 2. Spread it around or otherwise do something with it, after extracting the most salient and/or interesting stuff 3. Try to encourage other people to go consume info
Two items made me think about this recently. First was a conversation I had on Thursday, with a co-worker. I told him about some of the online courses I was taking, and while they're all interesting, my favorite is the CS101 course at Udacity. He asked me whether any of the stuff I've been learning would help me on the job. I kind of looked puzzled for a moment, and then I said, "That's not why I'm doing it. Think of it as a hobby." ( you know what you're getting into.... )
|
|
(4 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, March 4th, 2012
| |
8:19 am - STEP OFF, BITCH
|
In the continuing saga of my one-sided feud with Carl Bialek, the WSJ's "Numbers Guy", I see that the man is invading my territory:
A new research paper, and a census surprise, are calling into question some long-held beliefs about a morbid bit of math: how much mortality rates increase with age.
It's no surprise that the older a group of people get, the higher the percentage of them who will die in any given time period. Benjamin Gompertz, a 19th-century British mathematician, charted the increase in mortality rates as very regular. His Gompertz law of mortality says that each additional period brings a constant percentage increase in mortality rates.
I'm not going to get into the mortality rates of the very old (90+)-- that's not where most of the interesting action is, anyway. While it would be freaking out pensions, etc., if the mass of old people were knocking off at age 100+, the bulk of people are dying in their 80s now. And it can make quite a bit of difference if that mass of deaths moves from age 82 to age 85, for example.
What's interesting is what's happening in the longer-lived populations. Instead of the distribution simply moving rightward over time, there's been what's been called a "squaring of the mortality curve". A perfect "squared" mortality curve is one in which a lot of people live to some maximum age, and then they all drop dead. Obviously, that's not been happening in real life, but what happens is instead of a fairly spread out distribution around some mean, the mean gets pushed right, and the probability mass to the right of the mean is extremely bunched up past it. No long tails of mortality here.
This has been seen with the mortality curves for Japanese women, one of the longest-lived populations in the world currently. To be sure, one may be a bit skeptical of the stats, given how it had been discovered that the "oldest people" in Japan had been dead for years already. (Would be interesting to talk about how to deal with developing mortality tables when there's that sort of fraud going on).
In many respects, the trend of the shape of the mortality/morbidity (disease levels) is heartening, because it's saying one can have a fairly healthy old age, until right before the end, at which point everything falls apart. As opposed to lingering for decades.
Anyway, Bialik has more here. I'm not seeing that any of this is that new or interesting. If you want a better idea of mortality trends, the most advanced studies have come out of the UK (for a variety of reasons), and there are some interesting patterns the the specific UK data set due to WWII, or, more specifically, the austerity following the war. It has negatively impacted particular cohorts. Info is here, at the Continuous Mortality Investigation page.
|
|
(2 comments | comment on this)
|
| Saturday, March 3rd, 2012
| |
1:41 pm - Sudden Death
|
I just watched this: Bill Whittle's bit on Andrew Breitbart's death.
I don't totally agree with Bill. I don't think it was Twitter that killed Andrew, or that even Andrew killed Andrew.
Because my father died in a similar way. Of a heart attack. At age 38. And he wasn't some hurricane of energy.
To be sure, my father's two-pack-a-day habit wasn't helping, and he was about as overweight as I am. His diet sucked. He didn't exercise. And he had a very stressful job at IBM (when we lived in MD - his NC job was less toxic. There were issues there, too, but I don't want to get into that now.)
But if you die of a heart attack before you're 40.... well, I would have to say that there is likely something genetic going on. We didn't find out til afterward that my dad had some uncles who had also died very young of heart attacks. In the age before statins, plenty of men with shit lifestyles didn't have their first heart attacks until their 50s.
Unfortunately, not all of this can be found ahead of time. My dad had primo health coverage through IBM. He had had a full workup only months before his death - stress tests, cholesterol tests, blood tests, the works. And while the cholesterol numbers were high, the stress tests looked fine and it didn't seem like incipient death was lurking.
There was one tell, though, and it's something I've noticed since. My dad looked a lot older than he was.
We had gone to Hershey Park the summer before my dad died, and did one of those "guess your age" things. Now, the guy doing the guessing writes down his estimate in a little notebook, and if he's within the range, he shows you the guess. If he was wrong, generally he doesn't show you. But I managed to step behind the guy and look what he wrote down.
52.
And, I've got to say, my dad definitely looked more 52 than the 38 he was.
Maybe you won't agree with me, but I thought Breitbart looked older than 43. That was one of my shocks when I heard the news -- I didn't realize he was that close in age to me. I thought he looked much older. 50, at least.
So yes, it's great to tell people to treat themselves better, take it easy, etc. But consider the case of Jim Fixx. I doubt his running caused his death of a heart attack at age 52. He had also been a smoker, to be sure, but again, consider his family history.
In any case, my next birthday, in a little over a month, will be my 38th (if you count the first as the 0th, and being a good computer scientist, I do.) I had my first stress test/EKG when I was in my 20s. I had more when in 2010-2011 in the effort of trying to determine what the hell had gone wrong with me (current, pretty definite diagnosis: degenerate disc in my neck). Those all looked fine.
But then, it had looked fine for my dad.
I'm not saying that people shouldn't try to live healthier lives. Even those who have gotten the genetic short stick may be able to improve their outcomes... just not as well as most people.
What I'm really saying is: do you have enough life insurance coverage?
;)
|
|
|
| Sunday, February 26th, 2012
| |
4:11 pm - In praise of the singular "they"
|
I am a singular-theyist.
That is to say, I like to use the pronoun "they" and its derivatives to refer to a generic individual.
It is extremely easy to get away with this in regular speech, even formal speech. Most people barely notice it. ( i expect everyone to do their duty )
|
|
(8 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, February 19th, 2012
| |
2:58 pm - PLEASE MAKE IT STOP
|
When last I wrote on "The Numbers Guy", I commented:I have about had it with "The Numbers Guy" at the Wall Street Journal.
Because almost =every=one= of his articles are of the form: "People try to quantitatively estimate -blah-, but it's so haaaaaaaaard, and who can say?"
So what do I see today?
Many economists say the 120% threshold of Greek debt to GDP that is key to bailout talks isn't based in any particular economic principles. And the source of the figure isn't totally clear.
GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.
LOOK.
Is it so hard to say: "Models are based on various assumption sets, and one can have lots of different such reasonable sets, giving you different results"? "All models are wrong, but some are useful"? Come on. Throw me a bone.
If you'd like to have an "it's okay" ratio that doesn't have much basis in reality, it's the "It's okay to have public pensions only 80% funded". That's another that came from absolutely nowhere.
I understand the belief there needs to be some sort of "conflict" to make an interesting article. But there was little enlightenment other than this bit:
Gabriel Sterne, an economist with the investment-banking company Exotix in London and a former IMF economist, says the IMF's projections for Greece have gotten more realistic. Mr. Sterne praised their work but added, "Any forecast has a top-down element. There's a politically acceptable number you need to get to, and you get there."
Exactly.
Someone decided what the answer needed to be, and then they jiggered everything to get there. That's your usual political numbers game. At which point, it's not useful to say "it's haaaaaard" but "Because most people are scared of numbers, all sorts of bullshit is spouted to support whatever political decision has already been made as they figure it doesn't really matter."
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Sunday, February 12th, 2012
| |
5:37 pm - Mind of a programmer
|
I've been playing around with Codeacademy for the past few weeks, and it's fun, but I've not learned anything really new.
Oh, sure, I didn't really know javascript, per se, but I know lots of other languages, and nothing I've seen thus far is really out of the ordinary. It's just the normal picking up of syntax one must do when switching between many standard 3rd generation languages.
But, knowing what I do about programming, I see lots of issues with the lessons on the site. And, in particular, some of the assumptions that have gone into how these lessons are structured.
I'm sure I've told this story many times before, so I'll cut it. It's how I scared the crap out of my 3rd grade teacher with respect to programming. ( don't try to teach what you don't know )
So going through the Codeacademy exercises, especially recent additions, reminded me that there's lots of issues in actually being able to program. Being able to think things through logically is probably the easy part.
It's all the fiddly bits that drives people insane.
Programming has a lot in common with actuarial work - sure, you need to be logically minded, and understand how things fit together on a larger scale.... but more than most, you've got to be details-oriented to an extent that you seem obsessive. And there are a lot of details to keep track of.
I noticed in the Codeacademy exercises that there wasn't a clear laying out of some of those fiddly bits... and people were getting hung up on that. I think the instructors thought people would just copy/paste or just echo the "punctuation" that showed up in examples. They got so many questions on that aspect, they had to address it a bit more directly. I don't know if it did the job.
One of the larger issues, though, is how easily people can learn to program in general. I came across the following links from a spreadsheet-related mailing list (of all things):
Coding horror: separating the computing sheep and goats
Why Johnny can't program
Now, one of the things that came up was research a comp sci prof had done in teaching programming classes...just the intro classes. So he decided to come up with a little quiz that he gave to his classes before he even taught them anything... and then he'd give the quiz to them later.
Here's the quiz (Word doc). Here's the webpageof one of the researchers. Here's the paper that came out of their efforts.
To be sure, there are weaknesses in the approach they took (and I can think of some really obvious assumptions they overlooked). But one of the things that stood out was the result of people who had no consistent mental concept of what was going on with variable assignment.
These were the ones who would never "get it" -- at least, in the context of how programming classes are generally taught in college. There was a strong correlation with those who gave answers all over the place, and not doing well in the class.
The issue with Codeacademy is the assumption that most people can 'get it' if only given enough time and support.
That's not necessarily true, even if people have an interest in doing it.
I do believe, like many other things, such as reading and arithmetic, most people can learn basic levels. But assuming that many people can learn how to do something productive with programming, if only they had the support....no. It's not true. (But hey, you can be a half-assed programmer, and still get hired)
After having reviewed Codeacademy for myself, a person who has a lot of programming experience, I can't recommend it for my children. There are too many holes, and not enough useful feedback. I don't see that it would be interesting to them in the way that making a video for Youtube would be interesting (hey, I was making videos at that age, too... if I can figure out how to put this stuff on Youtube, I will. It's just on VHS for now.) Heck, reading books is more interesting.
(I'm actually thinking of putting together some Codeacademy exercises on floating point arithmetic... but this is getting waaaaaaay into fiddly bit territory. Still, might be a laugh.)
|
|
(2 comments | comment on this)
|
| Friday, February 3rd, 2012
| |
7:26 am - Unbundling the package deal
|
The question has become, more and more, what exactly is the purpose of universities -- at least with regards to education. Heck, even the usefulness with regards to being research centers can be brought up, but that's for another time.
Obviously, I've been thinking about education for a long time, and have been involved with online professional education for almost 5 years now. The particular event that has crystallized my current thread relates to the Stanford prof who has left to get involved in teaching online classes with Udacity, as well as MIT's announcement of its planned MITx project.
But the main issue I'm thinking about is: why is university education, whether undergrad or graduate level, structured the way it is? Why is it so costly in time and money? And does everybody need to spend the same amount of time and money to get value? Heck, aren't there activities at the universities that provide little value whatsoever, and should just be dumped? ( nothing new, actually )
|
|
(11 comments | comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, January 18th, 2012
| |
7:28 am - as a woman of a certain age....
|
...and a certain weight, and a certain condition of the cervical discs....
No, I have no deep insights.
Enjoy life.
That's all.
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012
| |
5:02 pm - Buying SAT scores for party schools?
|
CBS recently ran an interview with a guy who had been taking the SAT for other people and had gotten busted for it. Evidently, he had impersonated at least 16 people for taking the exams....let's see the positive spin the guy put on his business model:
Eshaghoff: Oh yeah, absolutely. Just like any other business person, you wanna have a good track record, right? And essentially like my whole clientele were based on word of mouth and like a referral system. So as soon as I, like, as soon as I saved one kid's life...
Stewart: Saving his life?
Eshaghoff: Saving his life.
Steart: What do you mean by saving his life?
Eshaghoff: I mean a kid who has a horrible grade point average, who no matter how much he studies is gonna totally bomb this test, by giving him an amazing score, I totally give him this like, a new lease on life. He's gonna go to a totally new college, he's gonna be bound for a totally new career and a totally new path in life.
Let's see what that "new path" actually was, shall we?
But while Eshaghoff routinely furnished sky-high scores for his clients — usually between 2170 and 2220 — many ended up in colleges that fell short of Ivy caliber.
One batch of busted customers included entrants to noted party schools like Arizona State and the University of Colorado.
Okay, let me check to see how "selective" those two schools are: Arizona State: acceptance rate of 86.4%, 4-year graduation rate: 32% (which is considered =medium=)
For University of Colorado, there are multiple campuses with separate acceptance rates, but I believe the one in Boulder is the one known as a party school: acceptance rate of 82.9%, 4-year graduation rate: 41%
I decided to check out my alma mater for its acceptance rate: NCSU has an acceptance rate of 53.9% ... and also one of those few universities still with a male undergrad population larger than the female population...MIT has a similar sex ratio. I checked all the UNC schools that were listed by US News, and the highest acceptance rate - UNC-Pembroke - was 77%. I couldn't get a graduation rate for NC State from that site.
It is possible that these ultra-high SAT scores were make-or-break for these individuals. But let's face it; these are not selective institutions.
It does make me wonder: a. where these kids were getting about $2 - 3K to pay for this guy to take the SAT for them and b. why they thought they couldn't get into party schools in the first place. To be sure, these kids came from some very rich schools on Long Island, but still... $3000?
When so many colleges are having to run remedial level classes (mind, you, remedial level classes in college tend to be 9th grade classes. That's certainly true for math), it doesn't seem to me these kids should've had too hard a time to get into the party schools of their dreams. Heck, if the issue was to booze it up for 4 years, it's obvious they have more than enough dough to throw some awesome parties. No need to be paying $30K+/year for the privilege of getting drunk on various campuses.
I'm too lazy to check out how all these people got nabbed, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were partly the large distance between the stellar SAT scores and their abysmal GPAs. Their are people with hideous grades and high SAT scores legitimately, but I think you're more likely to find decent GPAs and hideous SAT scores. (I'm too lazy to check those stats, too, which I'm sure the College Board people have... I'm guessing this from the relatively lenient high school grading and the numerous stories of "honors students" of high rank at their schools not being able to pass high school exit exams set at the 8th grade level. I assume their SAT scores would match.)
|
|
(2 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, January 2nd, 2012
| |
10:20 am - "High-stakes" testing and high school diplomas
|
I'm very pro-standardized testing...if the tests are good. [and this reminds me, I need to order the end-of-year tests for Bonnie & Mo]
So it was with interest that I read the account recently of a school board member in Florida sitting down to take some of the "high stakes" tests that the students in his district have to take:
A longtime friend on the school board of one of the largest school systems in America did something that few public servants are willing to do. He took versions of his state’s high-stakes standardized math and reading tests for 10th graders, and said he’d make his scores public.
By any reasonable measure, my friend is a success. His now-grown kids are well-educated. He has a big house in a good part of town. Paid-for condo in the Caribbean. Influential friends. Lots of frequent flyer miles. Enough time of his own to give serious attention to his school board responsibilities. The margins of his electoral wins and his good relationships with administrators and teachers testify to his openness to dialogue and willingness to listen.
..... “I won’t beat around the bush,” he wrote in an email. “The math section had 60 questions. I knew the answers to none of them, but managed to guess ten out of the 60 correctly. On the reading test, I got 62% . In our system, that’s a “D”, and would get me a mandatory assignment to a double block of reading instruction.
He continued, “It seems to me something is seriously wrong. I have a bachelor of science degree, two masters degrees, and 15 credit hours toward a doctorate.
( it goes on for a bit )
|
|
(8 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, January 1st, 2012
| |
9:51 am - New year, new developments, same thoughts on education and credentialing
|
|
| |
8:11 am - Happy New Year!
|
|
| Saturday, December 31st, 2011
| |
5:18 pm - Looking back on the year of escaping hell
|
Quick recap: I spent August 2010 laid up from a mysterious condition. I finally got a diagnosis in the new year: degenerate disc disease between cervical spine segments 5 & 6 (and got a nice set of MRIs to go with). I did physical therapy for a while, which helped, but mainly gave me a set of exercises I continue to do. At the end of this year, I started to get a massage every few weeks or so. I still spend most weekends laid up, in pain, but now that I know what it is, I find the situation more bearable.
In January, it was pretty clear that my company was going to close on the purchase of Transamerica Re in Charlotte, and that they would be moving operations there... so I started to quietly look for a new job.
Until the end of February, at which point we had several people resign over a relatively short time period, and ... it was pointless to be quiet about the job search. It was an ugly couple of months before I finally left for my current (day) job.
D has had several breakthroughs this year, including being potty-trained (well, partly), chewing food, and increasing his expressive range. His latest thing is to come up to Stu and say "Hi, Daddy!" and then come over to me and say "Hi, Mama!" - his usual thing was to parrot back "Hi, Diarmuid" to us... he just spontaneously started doing this a few days ago. He has been going around reading stuff, too. He's pretty good at it, but it's not clear how much he understands what he's saying.
The girls keep on keepin on. Bonnie got to go to camp for the first time this year, and she also stood down the group's con girl. They've been doing well, education-wise -- Mo is up to a 6th grade reading level now, and Bonnie is on a 2nd grade level. Mo is up to adding and subtracting fraction, and Bonnie is subtracting numbers up to 10. They both got a bunch of comic books from Santa (Get Fuzzy, Pearls Before Swine, Foxtrot, Calvin & Hobbes, and The Far Side), amongst other things, but those books are getting the most use right now.
We've had multiple power outages, and Stu got a generator that really helped with the last one.
It's pretty quiet... relatively. I like it that way.
|
|
(8 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, December 19th, 2011
| |
11:39 am - A memory sparked by the death of Kim Jong Il
|
I have nothing to say about Kim Jong Il. But his death reminds me of an episode from when I was staying in Japan.
This is what I wrote at the time:
7) Well this is big and interesting news. Kim Il Sung, leader of North Korea, died and the last 2 weeks have been quite a sob fest for the North Koreans and even some South Koreans. I sometimes wonder if the people feel =obliged= to make that big deal of a show. My host ma is kind of amused/surprised by all the wailing of the North Koreans -- Japanese would never make such a display of losing all composure -- and Americans haven't really either. Usu we just get really quiet. \
Anyway a few interesting things have come of this situation. North Korea is welcoming any Koreans who want to pay their respects, but the South Korea leaders, of course, do not want their people to be lining up w/ North Koreans, so the prime minister criticized Sung for starting the Korean war and breaking up Korea. Of course, this did not go over too well w/ the North Korean powers and one of the official radio stations went so far as to say this speech was a declaration of war. Whoopee. And talks were supposed to begin between the 2 Koreas...
There's a part to the story I didn't write down in my journal, which was pretty funny.
I was in a summer program in Japan in 1994, where I was staying with a Japanese family (just wife & husband, about mid-50s, they had a grown-up daughter who had one daughter herself).
I had a curfew from them of 11:30pm (yay), and so generally I'd go to the one bar that welcomed foreigners with the other students in the program, drink about 3-4 beers in one hour, and then go back to the house in a taxi. The host mother would be up watching TV when I got back.
So I get back that night, and she's got the TV on as per usual, and all that is being shown are all these people weeping & wailing.
(A note: my host mother didn't really speak English at all, and I had been studying Japanese for only 2 years)
It took her over a half hour to convey to me that Kim Il Sung had died. I'm smiling and nodding the entire time, nicely buzzed, and thinking my language skills are phenomenal - amazing how the drunker I got, the more I thought my communication skills improved.
All she was saying, over and over, was "Kim Il Sung is dead". That's it. She could tell I had no idea what she was talking about, so she kept pointing at the TV, and finally when a picture of Kim Il Sung popped up, I said "OOOOOOOHHHH".
The only funnier convo we had that summer involved learning the word "pantsu" didn't mean pants.
She told me at the end of the summer that I was the funniest student she had ever hosted. Because I kept saying/doing ridiculous things (and would laugh at myself when I realized the errors I had been making...and then would just go an make more silly mistakes.)
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Saturday, December 3rd, 2011
| |
7:15 pm - In praise of crappy gifts
|
(Stu, don't get any ideas... we've already got stupid in-jokes, and you shouldn't gild the lily)
I was reading this Slate article giving advice on giving gifts that will be appreciated.
Now, I understand the affliction of having a difficult time of picking out gifts, but the gifts that are remembered? The fantastic flops.
I remember a sum total of one gift for what I thought was positive reasons: my stepdad John gave me a 4-pack of gold-rimmed wine glasses. I tell you whut, I used the shit out of those glasses. Something about those glasses were just compelling.
[Yes, Stu, I remember a lot of stuff you have given me. Three of them are living with us right now. This is not about you.]
But what I remember the most, in general, are the gifts that missed the mark (but I understood the very good intentions behind them... these gifts weren't intended as insults and weren't intentionally thoughtless -- the people actually tried very hard. And I've been in the same situation as a gift-giver, so I can relate).
I've got two favorite stories here, one of which is a group story.
Growing up, we had a "tradition" of exchanging gifts with another family in my ma's extended family -- my Aunt Neena & crew. Generally, I would "give" a gift to cousin Robbie, Amy would give a gift to Jennifer, and Carey would give a gift to Katie. This generally worked.
One year, my mother told us that she had talked with her sister, Aunt Neena, and our theme that year was going to be "funny gifts" for cheap. So we went to a party store or Spencers (can't remember which) and got silly stuff like a pair of plastic sunglasses that had a bead that rolled around the frames (I can't remember the exact details). This was Oriental Trading Company quality stuff. So, you know... all gag gifts.
I do remember getting the gifts from Aunt Neena's crew out of the shipped package, and they all had similar bulk & squishiness. We were big believers in shaking and prodding presents before Christmas, in an attempt to deduce the contents. The packages all had similar qualities.
So our tradition was to open presents on Christmas Eve. I can't which of us three was the first to open the Aunt-Neena-crew gift. But whoever it was opened it up, and it was a generic Kmart sweatshirt decorated with puffy paint. Uhhhhhhhh......
[and we realized the other two were going to be the same]
There was a communication issue that year. I think Aunt Neena called us that evening about the gifts. She claimed that she said the theme was "creative gifts"... in any event, we laughed pretty hard over that one.
And I have never forgotten that.
The other gift I have never forgotten was a sweatsuit set I got when I was in middle school from my Grandma Cook. It had a dalmatian puppy theme. With glow-in-the-dark paw prints. I think I was 12 or 13 at the time, and considered it infantile. And then I heard -- horrors! -- my Aunt Pat (after whom I was named) had helped Nana pick it out!
As per Ralphie in The Christmas Story, and the bunny pajamas, I was mortified at the time. But it actually didn't take a long amount of time before I found it hilarious.
Seriously, it was extremely tacky.
I mean... kids have no taste, but.... come on. I was 13 or so.
Now, I'm not encouraging people to give presents that are personally insulting, like nose-hair clippers or breath mints, but I think one shouldn't worry too much about giving bad gifts.
Very few "appropriate" gifts are remembered. The "off" gifts are remembered forever. It cements human bonds.
Or just makes you an object of ridicule.
Don't worry too much about it.
|
|
(4 comments | comment on this)
|
| |
2:35 pm - Some conversations on geography
|
We were in the library, doing a puzzle of the states:
Mo: There's Oklahoma Me: Yes, Texas's hat
[other states fall into place]
Mo: And Idaho.... and it's like Montana's coat
.....
Mo: Tennessee... it's like Kentucky's.....boot.
[I shouldn't have given her the idea]
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| |
6:57 am - For mercyorbemoaned....
|
It's not higher education that's been corrupting the wimminfolk -- it's driving.
It's science:
Repealing a ban on women drivers in Saudi Arabia would result in ‘no more virgins’, the country’s religious council has warned.
A ‘scientific’ report claims relaxing the ban would also see more Saudis - both men and women - turn to homosexuality and pornography.
The startling conclusions were drawn by Muslim scholars at the Majlis al-Ifta’ al-A’ala, Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, working in conjunction with Kamal Subhi, a former professor at the King Fahd University.
|
|
(1 comment | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, December 1st, 2011
| |
9:52 am - Too many (and then too few) college students
|
No, not in the U.S. In South Korea.
His South Korean counterpart, meanwhile, warns of a glut of university graduates and a work force hard-wired to outdated 20th-century manufacturing skills. "Reckless entrance into college is bringing huge losses to families and the country alike," said President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea recently.
Mr. Lee has raised eyebrows, and hackles, by suggesting that fewer people should go to college from a population of 50 million that sustains 3.8 million undergraduate and graduate students.
.... But with a demographic crisis looming, the government now admits that the expansion has gone too far. "We allowed too many universities to open," says Sung Geun Bae, director general of South Korea's education ministry. Mr. Sung points out that his country simultaneously has one of the world's highest university enrollment rates—and one of the world's lowest birthrates. "Fifteen years ago we needed all those universities, but times have changed."
What that means for the nation's 40 public universities and 400 private colleges is still being debated across the nation, but the writing is on the wall. Education Minister Lee Ju-Ho warns that student enrollment at Korean colleges will plummet by 40 percent in the next 12 years. By 2016 there will already be more university places than high-school graduates, and many institutions will be forced to shut their gates or merge in what is likely to be a very painful downsizing for a nation that reveres education.
.... In an effort to move the debate forward—and help families decrease education-related expenses—President Lee has proposed that parents lower their educational aspirations and consider vocational schools or other job-training opportunities rather than expensive four-year universities. The idea has been condemned by some, but Lee Seongho, a professor of education at Chung-Ang University says the president is correct—and that Mr. Obama shouldn't hold up South Korea as a model of education success.
"President Obama suffers from an illusion about South Korean education," he says.
Mr. Lee says that his students have unrealistic expectations about college and that an increasing number are out of work after graduation. "I say, 'Think seriously: Do you really want to waste a huge amount of money and four years of your life for nothing?'"
Commentators like Mr. Lee accept that the notion of downsizing a nation of such high educational achievers is politically fraught, but many say South Korea's higher-education system will emerge stronger. Ms. Yu of the Korean Educational Development Institute believes that competition will force universities to focus on quality and change how they teach. "I think we will start to think about whether it is necessary to have students in classrooms at all. There is a lot of innovation in digital and online colleges."
Well, there's a couple things the Korean colleges can do to maintain the numbers. First, they can try to enroll all those Chinese students from shut-down programs. Sure, there are language issues, but I bet they can figure it out.
This isn't going to be too different from the issues that will hit higher education the world over. "Luckily", in the U.S., many colleges have switched to part-time faculty, which are easy to cut when fewer students come in. Also, the U.S. tends to have a different attitude towards education and "career progression" than many other developed countries -- we don't think it that unusual for people to go for further education when they're older, or to switch career fields multiple times.
But it does seem the "college for all!" mantra is a worldwide cargo cult. At some point, when the planes carrying cargo don't arrive, people start to question whether the various cargo rituals had any value at all.
|
|
(10 comments | comment on this)
|
|
|
|
|